A company is developing a new mobile app for booking appointments. They have a limited budget and a tight deadline. They want to ensure the app is accessible to users with visual impairments. They have a small team with no accessibility expertise. Which evaluation approach is most appropriate?

Hiring an external accessibility consultant for a one-time audit.

Conducting user-based testing with a small group of users with visual impairments.

Automated testing using free tools.

Using a combination of automated testing and a manual review by the development team.

A company is developing a new website and has a limited budget. They want to ensure accessibility but cannot afford user testing. They have a small team with some accessibility knowledge. Which evaluation method should they prioritize?

Manual expert review, because it provides a thorough assessment.

A combination of automated testing and manual expert review.

User-based testing, because it provides real user feedback.

Automated testing, because it is free and fast.

Which statement best describes the purpose of automated accessibility evaluation tools?

They replace the need for manual testing by experts

They quickly identify a subset of potential accessibility problems in code

They provide a complete assessment of all accessibility issues

They evaluate the user experience of people with disabilities

Which of the following is a primary purpose of user-based accessibility evaluation?

To identify usability issues that affect people with disabilities in real interaction

To replace the need for expert review and automated checks

To automatically detect all accessibility violations in the interface

To verify that code complies with a specific accessibility standard

What is a key characteristic of a manual expert review for accessibility?

It requires participants with disabilities to complete tasks

It is performed by automated software tools

It is only useful after the product is fully developed

It relies on a trained evaluator applying guidelines and heuristics

Certified Tester Usability Testing

Domain 7Objective 3

Selecting an Accessibility Evaluation Method CT-UT Practice Questions (Page 2)

Part of the Selecting Appropriate Methods domain, which makes up ~6% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 60-minute exam (~25–40 total, ~2–2 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 28 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

28questions here

6free pages

7concepts

Questions 6–10

6expert · hard
A company is developing a new mobile app for booking appointments. They have a limited budget and a tight deadline. They want to ensure the app is accessible to users with visual impairments. They have a small team with no accessibility expertise. Which evaluation approach is most appropriate?
Select an answer first
7expert · hard
A company is developing a new website and has a limited budget. They want to ensure accessibility but cannot afford user testing. They have a small team with some accessibility knowledge. Which evaluation method should they prioritize?
Select an answer first
8foundation · easy
Which statement best describes the purpose of automated accessibility evaluation tools?
Select an answer first
9foundation · easy
Which of the following is a primary purpose of user-based accessibility evaluation?
Select an answer first
10foundation · easy
What is a key characteristic of a manual expert review for accessibility?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CT-UT

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-UT” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.