A development team has just completed a major update to their web application. They want to quickly check for any new accessibility issues before the release. Which method is most efficient?

Organize a user testing session with people with disabilities.

Conduct a full manual expert review of the entire application.

Review the code for accessibility issues manually.

Run an automated accessibility scan on the updated pages.

Which combination of methods is most likely to provide a comprehensive accessibility evaluation?

User-based testing with a single participant

Automated testing, expert review, and user-based testing

What is a recommended practice when reporting accessibility evaluation findings?

List all issues without prioritization

Avoid mentioning the evaluation methods used

Only report issues that are easy to fix

Include clear descriptions, evidence, and severity ratings

After conducting a manual expert review of a mobile app, an accessibility specialist has a list of issues. What is the most effective way to report these findings to the development team?

Send a long email listing all issues in order of discovery.

Create a prioritized report with severity levels, affected user groups, and suggested fixes.

Verbally describe the issues in a meeting without written documentation.

File each issue as a separate bug with minimal context.

A startup is developing a new mobile app. They have a small team and a limited budget. They want to ensure the app is accessible but cannot afford extensive testing. They have one developer with basic accessibility knowledge. Which evaluation strategy is most appropriate?

Automated testing only, using free tools.

Manual expert review by the developer, supplemented by automated testing.

User-based testing with a small group of users with disabilities.

Hiring an external accessibility consultant.

Certified Tester Usability Testing

Domain 7Objective 3

Selecting an Accessibility Evaluation Method CT-UT Practice Questions (Page 1)

Part of the Selecting Appropriate Methods domain, which makes up ~6% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 60-minute exam (~25–40 total, ~2–2 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 28 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

28questions here

6free pages

7concepts

Questions 1–5

1application · easy
A development team has just completed a major update to their web application. They want to quickly check for any new accessibility issues before the release. Which method is most efficient?
Select an answer first
2foundation · easy
Which combination of methods is most likely to provide a comprehensive accessibility evaluation?
Select an answer first
3foundation · easy
What is a recommended practice when reporting accessibility evaluation findings?
Select an answer first
4application · medium
After conducting a manual expert review of a mobile app, an accessibility specialist has a list of issues. What is the most effective way to report these findings to the development team?
Select an answer first
5expert · hard
A startup is developing a new mobile app. They have a small team and a limited budget. They want to ensure the app is accessible but cannot afford extensive testing. They have one developer with basic accessibility knowledge. Which evaluation strategy is most appropriate?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CT-UT

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-UT” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.