Set up Scope Governance Structures and Practices on Built Environment Projects PMI-CP Practice Questions (Page 1)

Questions 1–5

1. 1expert · hard

   A project has a well-documented scope baseline. A series of minor changes have been approved and implemented, but the baseline has not been updated for several months. The project manager is now preparing a progress report. What is the most significant risk of not updating the baseline?

   • AThe project team may be working against outdated scope, leading to rework and misalignment.
   • BThe project budget will automatically increase.
   • CThe project sponsor may lose confidence in the project manager.
   • DThe change control board may reject future changes.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
2. 2application · medium

   A project manager is establishing scope governance documentation for a new commercial building. Which set of documents is essential to support the governance framework?

   • AScope management plan, project charter, and change request log.
   • BRisk register, issue log, and lessons learned.
   • CProcurement plan, contract documents, and vendor list.
   • DOrganizational chart, job descriptions, and HR policies.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
4. 3foundation · easy

   Which document is used to record all proposed and approved scope changes?

   • AScope change register
   • BRisk register
   • CProject charter
   • DWork breakdown structure
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
5. 4foundation · easy

   In a scope governance framework, what is the purpose of reviewing a scope change request before approval?

   • ATo assign resources to implement the change immediately
   • BTo ensure the change aligns with project objectives and constraints
   • CTo document the change in the lessons learned register
   • DTo inform the project team of the change via email
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
6. 5application · medium

   A project manager is reviewing the scope governance process for a rail expansion project. The process currently requires all changes to be approved by the full change control board, which meets biweekly. This has caused delays in minor changes. What is the most effective way to improve the process?

   • ADelegate approval authority for minor changes to a designated sub-committee, while reserving major changes for the full board.
   • BAllow the project manager to approve all changes and inform the board monthly.
   • CEliminate the change control board and rely on the project sponsor for all approvals.
   • DIncrease the frequency of board meetings to weekly to speed up approvals.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first