A service provider is deploying a new MPLS-based Layer 3 VPN service for a customer with multiple sites. The customer requires that their routing information remain isolated from other customers sharing the same provider edge routers. Which tunneling approach should the provider implement to meet this requirement?

Configure a GRE tunnel between the customer sites and run BGP over it

Establish an L2TP tunnel from each CE router to the PE router

Deploy a simple IP-in-IP tunnel between each customer site

Use an MPLS L3VPN with per-customer VRF instances on the PE routers

A service provider must offer both Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPN services over the same MPLS backbone. The provider wants to use a single tunneling mechanism to reduce complexity. However, the Layer 2 service requires the ability to transport raw Ethernet frames, while the Layer 3 service requires IP routing. Which approach satisfies both requirements?

Use IP-IP tunnels for both services

Use only GRE tunnels with routing protocols

Use LDP-based MPLS with separate label stacks for L2VPN and L3VPN

Use VPLS for both L2 and L3 services

A service provider wants to steer specific customer traffic onto a less congested path through their backbone without changing the underlying IGP metrics. The traffic must be carried over an MPLS tunnel that follows an explicit path. Which tunneling application should be used?

A GRE tunnel with a static route

A VPLS instance across the backbone

LDP over the existing IGP paths

RSVP-TE with an explicit-path configuration

A network engineer is configuring a GRE tunnel between two routers. The tunnel will carry multicast traffic for a customer's video conferencing application. What is a critical consideration for this deployment?

IPsec must be used instead of GRE for multicast

GRE tunnels support multicast natively without additional configuration

The tunnel MTU must be increased to support multicast

GRE tunnels do not support multicast traffic

A provider is designing a new backbone and must choose between using LDP or RSVP-TE for label distribution. The network will carry a mix of L3VPN and L2VPN services. The provider wants to support traffic engineering and fast reroute for all services. What is the most appropriate choice?

Use LDP for all label distribution

Use RSVP-TE for all label distribution

Use LDP for L3VPN and RSVP-TE for L2VPN

Use static labels for all services

Juniper NetworksCertified Specialist, Service Provider Routing and Switching (JNCIS-SP)

Domain 9Objective 1

Tunneling Applications and Considerations JN0-364 Practice Questions (Page 2)

Part of the Tunnels domain, which makes up ~4% of our current practice bank. Juniper Networks does not publish an official question count, but from its 90-minute exam (~35–60 total, ~1–2 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 23 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

23questions here

5free pages

2concepts

Questions 6–10

6application · medium
A service provider is deploying a new MPLS-based Layer 3 VPN service for a customer with multiple sites. The customer requires that their routing information remain isolated from other customers sharing the same provider edge routers. Which tunneling approach should the provider implement to meet this requirement?
Select an answer first
7expert · hard
A service provider must offer both Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPN services over the same MPLS backbone. The provider wants to use a single tunneling mechanism to reduce complexity. However, the Layer 2 service requires the ability to transport raw Ethernet frames, while the Layer 3 service requires IP routing. Which approach satisfies both requirements?
Select an answer first
8application · medium
A service provider wants to steer specific customer traffic onto a less congested path through their backbone without changing the underlying IGP metrics. The traffic must be carried over an MPLS tunnel that follows an explicit path. Which tunneling application should be used?
Select an answer first
9application · medium
A network engineer is configuring a GRE tunnel between two routers. The tunnel will carry multicast traffic for a customer's video conferencing application. What is a critical consideration for this deployment?
Select an answer first
10expert · hard
A provider is designing a new backbone and must choose between using LDP or RSVP-TE for label distribution. The network will carry a mix of L3VPN and L2VPN services. The provider wants to support traffic engineering and fast reroute for all services. What is the most appropriate choice?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to JN0-364

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by Juniper Networks. “JN0-364” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.

Tunneling Applications and Considerations JN0-364 Practice Questions (Page 2)

Questions 6–10

A service provider wants to steer specific customer traffic onto a less congested path through their backbone without changing the underlying IGP metrics. The traffic must be carried over an MPLS tunnel that follows an explicit path. Which tunneling application should be used?

A network engineer is configuring a GRE tunnel between two routers. The tunnel will carry multicast traffic for a customer's video conferencing application. What is a critical consideration for this deployment?

A provider is designing a new backbone and must choose between using LDP or RSVP-TE for label distribution. The network will carry a mix of L3VPN and L2VPN services. The provider wants to support traffic engineering and fast reroute for all services. What is the most appropriate choice?

Keep studying — Tunnels