Which activity is an example of facilitating collaboration between agile and non-agile test teams?

Holding a single status meeting at the end of each month.

Organizing cross-team workshops to discuss testing challenges and solutions.

Requiring each team to work independently and share only final reports.

Assigning all testing tasks to the team with the most experience.

An organization has agile teams that report test results in a continuous integration dashboard, while the non-agile test team produces PDF reports after each release. Management wants a single view of overall product quality. What is the most effective approach to integrate these test results?

Ask the non-agile team to enter their results into the CI dashboard manually after each release.

Create a unified quality dashboard that pulls automated test results from the CI system and manual test results from the non-agile team's test management tool.

Have the agile teams stop using the CI dashboard and rely on the PDF reports.

Schedule a monthly meeting where both teams present their test results to management.

Agile teams use a risk-based testing approach to prioritize test cases, while the non-agile team uses a checklist-based approach. This leads to inconsistent test coverage and difficulty comparing results. What is the best way to align test processes to ensure consistency?

Create a single test plan that is used by both teams, with no deviations allowed.

Require the non-agile team to adopt the agile team's risk-based approach exactly.

Have both teams use the same test case management tool to store their test cases.

Define a common risk assessment framework that both teams use to prioritize test cases, while allowing flexibility in execution.

An agile team uses exploratory testing sessions and automated checks, while the non-agile team follows a strict scripted regression process. The non-agile team complains that the agile team's testing is not rigorous, while the agile team finds the non-agile process too rigid. What is the primary coordination challenge here?

The agile team does not have enough time to perform regression testing.

Different testing philosophies and definitions of 'done' lead to conflicting expectations.

The non-agile team lacks the technical skills to understand automated tests.

There is a lack of a shared test management tool.

What is the purpose of integrating test results from agile and non-agile teams?

To ensure that all teams use the same test automation tool.

To reduce the total number of test cases executed across teams.

To provide a unified view of the overall quality of the product.

To assign blame for defects to a specific team.

Certified Tester Agile Test Leadership at Scale

Domain 5Objective 2

Coordinate Test Efforts Across Agile and Non-Agile Teams CT-ATLAS Practice Questions (Page 5)

Part of the Test Processes in a Value-Driven Organization domain, which makes up ~25% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 120-minute exam (~50–80 total, ~13–20 in this domain), expect 3–4 from this objective — we provide 34 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

34questions here

7free pages

7concepts

Questions 21–25

21foundation · easy
Which activity is an example of facilitating collaboration between agile and non-agile test teams?
Select an answer first
22application · medium
An organization has agile teams that report test results in a continuous integration dashboard, while the non-agile test team produces PDF reports after each release. Management wants a single view of overall product quality. What is the most effective approach to integrate these test results?
Select an answer first
23application · medium
Agile teams use a risk-based testing approach to prioritize test cases, while the non-agile team uses a checklist-based approach. This leads to inconsistent test coverage and difficulty comparing results. What is the best way to align test processes to ensure consistency?
Select an answer first
24application · medium
An agile team uses exploratory testing sessions and automated checks, while the non-agile team follows a strict scripted regression process. The non-agile team complains that the agile team's testing is not rigorous, while the agile team finds the non-agile process too rigid. What is the primary coordination challenge here?
Select an answer first
25foundation · easy
What is the purpose of integrating test results from agile and non-agile teams?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CT-ATLAS

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-ATLAS” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.