Roles and Responsibilities in Reviews CTFL Practice Questions (Page 2)

Questions 6–10

1. 6application · medium

   During a formal review of a design document, a reviewer identifies a potential flaw in the proposed architecture. The author disagrees with the reviewer's interpretation and believes the design is sound. What is the author's best course of action during the review meeting?

   • AAsk the moderator to overrule the reviewer's comment.
   • BExplain their reasoning and, if the disagreement persists, note it as an open point for the recorder to document.
   • CImmediately revise the design document during the meeting to address the comment.
   • DAccept the reviewer's comment without discussion to avoid conflict.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
2. 7application · medium

   During a formal review meeting, the discussion produces several action items, including a request for the author to clarify a section of the code and a suggestion to add a test case. The recorder is responsible for documenting these outcomes. What is the most important aspect of the recorder's role in this situation?

   • ADeciding which action items are important enough to record.
   • BProviding an opinion on the technical validity of each action item.
   • CRecording the action items, the responsible person, and the due date for each item.
   • DEnsuring that the action items are implemented before the end of the meeting.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
4. 8foundation · easy

   Why is it important for the recorder to document findings accurately?

   • ATo assign blame for defects to specific individuals
   • BTo replace the need for a separate review report
   • CTo provide a basis for the moderator's performance review
   • DTo ensure that all action items are tracked and completed
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
5. 9foundation · easy

   What is the primary responsibility of the recorder during a formal review?

   • ATo lead the review meeting
   • BTo allocate resources for the review
   • CTo document findings, decisions, and action items
   • DTo fix defects found in the work product
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
6. 10expert · hard

   A formal review of a large requirements document is conducted. The recorder has captured all findings and action items. After the meeting, the moderator reviews the recorded action items and notices that several are vague, such as 'improve the document' without specifying what to improve. What should the moderator do?

   • AAccept the action items as recorded and close the review.
   • BAsk the recorder to clarify the action items with the responsible persons before the review is closed.
   • CEscalate the issue to the manager to decide on the action items.
   • DRewrite the action items himself to make them clearer.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first