Review Process Activities CTFL Practice Questions (Page 1)

Questions 1–5

1. 1application · medium

   After a review meeting, the author has fixed several defects. What is the next step in the review process?

   • AThe author sends the fixed document directly to stakeholders.
   • BThe review is closed without any further action.
   • CThe moderator verifies that the fixes are correct and updates the review report.
   • DThe reviewers re-review the entire document from scratch.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
2. 2application · medium

   After a review, the moderator needs to decide if the work product is ready for the next phase. Which output of the review process provides this information?

   • AThe author's statement that all defects are fixed.
   • BThe list of reviewers who participated.
   • CThe meeting minutes, which record all discussions.
   • DThe review report, which includes the outcome and defect summary.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
4. 3application · medium

   During an inspection of a requirements document, a reviewer notes a potential ambiguity in a requirement. According to the review process, what should the reviewer do with this finding?

   • ARecord the issue and bring it to the review meeting for discussion and resolution.
   • BAsk the moderator to decide the outcome without discussion.
   • CFix the ambiguity immediately in the document before the meeting.
   • DKeep the finding private to avoid embarrassing the author.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
5. 4application · medium

   A project team is about to conduct a technical review of a design specification. The project manager wants to ensure the review is efficient and does not waste participants' time. Which action is most important to take during the planning phase of the review?

   • ASkip the entry criteria check to save time and start the review immediately.
   • BInvite all project stakeholders to the review meeting to ensure broad input.
   • CDistribute the design specification to reviewers well in advance and define the review entry criteria.
   • DAsk the author to present the document without prior distribution to keep the meeting fresh.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
6. 5expert · hard

   A reviewer has completed individual preparation and identified several potential defects. However, the reviewer is unsure if some are real defects. What should the reviewer do?

   • ABring all potential defects to the review meeting for discussion and clarification.
   • BAsk the moderator to decide which defects are real before the meeting.
   • CFix the potential defects directly in the document.
   • DOnly report defects that the reviewer is certain about.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first