What is a key advantage of manual accessibility testing over automated testing?

It automatically generates a compliance report for legal purposes

It can identify issues that require human judgment, such as whether a page is logically ordered

It can be performed without any knowledge of accessibility standards

It is faster and requires less expertise than automated testing

A product team is developing a new online learning platform. They want to ensure it is accessible to all potential users, including those with disabilities. Which definition best captures accessibility in this context?

The product is tested with users with disabilities.

The product complies with all legal accessibility requirements.

The product is easy to use for the average user.

The product can be used by people with disabilities without any special adaptations.

A development team has just completed an accessibility audit using an automated tool and found no errors. However, they are unsure if the product is truly accessible. Which next step is most appropriate?

Run the automated tool again with different settings to confirm the results.

Conduct manual testing with assistive technologies and users with disabilities.

Conclude that the product is accessible because the automated tool found no issues.

Skip further testing because the product meets WCAG criteria.

A usability tester has identified several accessibility issues in a web application. The project manager asks for a report that will help the development team prioritize fixes. Which format is most useful?

A verbal presentation of the findings without a written report.

A video recording of the usability test sessions showing the issues.

A list of all issues with their WCAG success criteria and severity ratings.

A summary of the issues in plain language without technical details.

What is a best practice for reporting accessibility findings to stakeholders?

Reporting only the issues that are easy to fix

Using technical jargon to demonstrate expertise

Presenting issues in a clear, prioritized list with actionable recommendations

Focusing only on the number of issues found, not their impact

Certified Tester Usability Testing

Domain 1Objective 3

Accessibility CT-UT Practice Questions (Page 1)

Part of the Basic Concepts domain, which makes up ~26% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 60-minute exam (~25–40 total, ~7–10 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 35 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

35questions here

7free pages

8concepts

Questions 1–5

1foundation · easy
What is a key advantage of manual accessibility testing over automated testing?
Select an answer first
2application · medium
A product team is developing a new online learning platform. They want to ensure it is accessible to all potential users, including those with disabilities. Which definition best captures accessibility in this context?
Select an answer first
3application · medium
A development team has just completed an accessibility audit using an automated tool and found no errors. However, they are unsure if the product is truly accessible. Which next step is most appropriate?
Select an answer first
4application · medium
A usability tester has identified several accessibility issues in a web application. The project manager asks for a report that will help the development team prioritize fixes. Which format is most useful?
Select an answer first
5foundation · easy
What is a best practice for reporting accessibility findings to stakeholders?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CT-UT

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-UT” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.