A usability team is testing a new public-facing website for a US city government. The city is subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The team has a limited budget and must decide how to allocate resources. What is the most legally sound approach?

Defer accessibility testing to the next release to save money

Prioritize testing with users with disabilities and fix critical accessibility issues before launch

Test only with users who do not have disabilities to reduce costs

Use only automated accessibility tools to reduce the need for human participants

A usability consultant is hired by a private Australian company to test a new e-commerce website. The company's legal team asks the consultant to ensure the testing process complies with relevant accessibility legislation. Which legislation is most directly relevant to this private Australian company?

The Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA), which makes it unlawful to discriminate against people with disabilities in the provision of goods and services

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is the US equivalent

The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), which is a Canadian provincial law

The European Accessibility Act (EAA), which is the EU standard

A usability team is testing a new public-facing website for a US federal agency. The agency must comply with Section 508. The team has a limited budget and must choose between two testing approaches: (1) a comprehensive test with 20 participants, including 5 with disabilities, or (2) a focused test with 10 participants, all with disabilities. The website is complex and has many interactive features. Which approach is more likely to satisfy the legal obligation?

Approach 1, because it provides a broader sample of user needs and still includes users with disabilities

Neither approach is sufficient because Section 508 requires automated testing

Approach 2, because it focuses exclusively on users with disabilities, which is the core of Section 508

Either approach is equally compliant because both include users with disabilities

When planning a usability test for a public-facing website that must comply with the ADA, which of the following is a required testing practice?

Using automated testing tools exclusively to check for accessibility compliance

Testing only with participants who have no disabilities to ensure a baseline of usability

Conducting the test in a location that is accessible only to authorized personnel

Including participants with disabilities who use assistive technologies, such as screen readers

Which piece of legislation specifically mandates that public sector websites and mobile applications in the European Union meet accessibility requirements?

The European Accessibility Act (EAA)

The Web Accessibility Directive (Directive (EU) 2016/2102)

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Certified Tester Usability Testing

Domain 3Objective 5

Accessibility Legislation CT-UT Practice Questions (Page 2)

Part of the Usability and Accessibility Standards domain, which makes up ~15% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 60-minute exam (~25–40 total, ~4–6 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 17 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

17questions here

4free pages

3concepts

Questions 6–10

6application · medium
A usability team is testing a new public-facing website for a US city government. The city is subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The team has a limited budget and must decide how to allocate resources. What is the most legally sound approach?
Select an answer first
7application · medium
A usability consultant is hired by a private Australian company to test a new e-commerce website. The company's legal team asks the consultant to ensure the testing process complies with relevant accessibility legislation. Which legislation is most directly relevant to this private Australian company?
Select an answer first
8expert · hard
A usability team is testing a new public-facing website for a US federal agency. The agency must comply with Section 508. The team has a limited budget and must choose between two testing approaches: (1) a comprehensive test with 20 participants, including 5 with disabilities, or (2) a focused test with 10 participants, all with disabilities. The website is complex and has many interactive features. Which approach is more likely to satisfy the legal obligation?
Select an answer first
9foundation · easy
When planning a usability test for a public-facing website that must comply with the ADA, which of the following is a required testing practice?
Select an answer first
10foundation · easy
Which piece of legislation specifically mandates that public sector websites and mobile applications in the European Union meet accessibility requirements?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CT-UT

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-UT” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.

Accessibility Legislation CT-UT Practice Questions (Page 2)

Questions 6–10

A usability team is testing a new public-facing website for a US city government. The city is subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The team has a limited budget and must decide how to allocate resources. What is the most legally sound approach?

When planning a usability test for a public-facing website that must comply with the ADA, which of the following is a required testing practice?

Which piece of legislation specifically mandates that public sector websites and mobile applications in the European Union meet accessibility requirements?

Keep studying — Usability and Accessibility Standards