What is the main benefit of using few-shot prompting for test case generation?

It guarantees that all edge cases are covered

It eliminates the need for any test data

It helps the model produce outputs that follow the style and format of the examples

A team is evaluating an AI's ability to generate test cases for a new feature. They want to assess the AI's baseline performance without any examples or specific role assignments. They also want to understand the AI's reasoning to identify potential gaps. Which approach is most appropriate?

Use zero-shot prompting for the baseline and then chain-of-thought prompting to analyze the reasoning

Use few-shot prompting with examples from a similar feature

Use iterative refinement to improve the output

Use role prompting to assign the model the role of 'test architect'

A tester is using an AI to generate test data for a user registration form. The first prompt produced data that was mostly valid but missed several invalid input formats. The tester wants to improve the output to include more negative test cases. What is the best next step?

Use the same prompt again, hoping for different results

Ask the AI to explain its reasoning for each test case

Refine the prompt by explicitly requesting invalid inputs and providing an example of a negative test case

Switch to a different AI tool entirely

Certified Tester Testing with Generative AI

Domain 2Objective 2

Core Prompting Techniques for Software Testing CT-GENAI Practice Questions (Page 4)

Part of the Prompt Engineering for Effective Software Testing domain, which makes up ~30% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 60-minute exam (~25–40 total, ~8–12 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 24 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

24questions here

5free pages

7concepts

Questions 16–20

16foundation · easy
A tester includes the user story and acceptance criteria in the prompt before asking for test cases. Which prompting technique is being used?
Select an answer first
17foundation · easy
What is the main benefit of using few-shot prompting for test case generation?
Select an answer first
18expert · hard
A team is evaluating an AI's ability to generate test cases for a new feature. They want to assess the AI's baseline performance without any examples or specific role assignments. They also want to understand the AI's reasoning to identify potential gaps. Which approach is most appropriate?
Select an answer first
19application · medium
A tester is using an AI to generate test data for a user registration form. The first prompt produced data that was mostly valid but missed several invalid input formats. The tester wants to improve the output to include more negative test cases. What is the best next step?
Select an answer first
20foundation · easy
A tester asks the AI: 'Think step by step about the possible inputs for a function that divides two numbers, then generate test cases.' Which prompting technique is being used?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CT-GENAI

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-GENAI” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.

Core Prompting Techniques for Software Testing CT-GENAI Practice Questions (Page 4)

Questions 16–20

A tester includes the user story and acceptance criteria in the prompt before asking for test cases. Which prompting technique is being used?

What is the main benefit of using few-shot prompting for test case generation?

A team is evaluating an AI's ability to generate test cases for a new feature. They want to assess the AI's baseline performance without any examples or specific role assignments. They also want to understand the AI's reasoning to identify potential gaps. Which approach is most appropriate?

A tester is using an AI to generate test data for a user registration form. The first prompt produced data that was mostly valid but missed several invalid input formats. The tester wants to improve the output to include more negative test cases. What is the best next step?

A tester asks the AI: 'Think step by step about the possible inputs for a function that divides two numbers, then generate test cases.' Which prompting technique is being used?

Keep studying — Prompt Engineering for Effective Software Testing