Objectives of ASPICE and ISO 26262 CT-AUT Practice Questions (Page 7)

Questions 31–33

1. 31expert · hard

   A supplier is developing a steering system with ASIL D requirements. The customer requires both ASPICE capability level 2 and ISO 26262 compliance. The supplier has a strong ASPICE process but lacks ISO 26262 expertise. What is the most effective way to achieve both?

   • AFocus on ISO 26262 first and then map it to ASPICE, since safety is more critical.
   • BUse a separate team for ISO 26262 to keep it independent from the ASPICE process.
   • COutsource all ISO 26262 activities to a third-party consultant to avoid internal effort.
   • DTrain the existing ASPICE process team on ISO 26262 and integrate safety activities into the existing process framework.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
2. 32foundation · easy

   In terms of assessment approach, how does ASPICE differ from ISO 26262?

   • AASPICE uses safety audits, while ISO 26262 uses process maturity models
   • BBoth use the same assessment approach
   • CASPICE uses crash tests, while ISO 26262 uses software reviews
   • DASPICE uses process capability ratings, while ISO 26262 uses safety compliance checks
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
3. 33application · medium

   A test team is creating a traceability matrix for a safety-critical system. They need to show that each safety requirement is tested. How should they align ASPICE and ISO 26262 to achieve this?

   • AUse only ASPICE's traceability requirements, since ISO 26262 does not require traceability.
   • BUse ASPICE's traceability requirements to link safety requirements to test cases, and use ISO 26262's verification criteria to define the test coverage.
   • CCreate a separate traceability matrix for each standard to avoid confusion.
   • DUse only ISO 26262's traceability requirements, since ASPICE does not require traceability.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first