A company is introducing AI-assisted code review to help new developers learn coding standards. They want to ensure that the AI feedback is educational and not just a list of corrections. What is the best way to use AI review for this purpose?

Have new developers read AI comments and ask questions about them.

Use AI comments as a basis for mentoring sessions with senior developers.

Require new developers to fix all AI comments without asking for help.

Disable AI review for new developers until they learn the standards.

Which of the following is an example of a minor improvement that an AI review might suggest?

Refactoring a function to reduce its cyclomatic complexity

Suggesting to use a more descriptive variable name

Fixing a SQL injection vulnerability in a query

Adding error handling for a null pointer exception

What is a best practice for using AI-assisted code review effectively?

Use AI review as a supplement to human review, not a replacement

Accept all AI suggestions without question to improve efficiency

Only use AI review for small merge requests, not large ones

Rely solely on AI review and skip human review to save time

An AI review suggests using a more efficient data structure in a performance-critical section of code. The developer applies the suggestion, but the code now fails a unit test. What should the developer do?

Modify the unit test to match the new implementation.

Investigate the test failure and adjust the implementation to pass the test.

Escalate the issue to the AI review team.

Revert the change and reject the AI suggestion.

During an AI-assisted code review, the AI flags a potential null pointer dereference in a new function and also suggests renaming a local variable for clarity. The developer has limited time. What should the developer prioritize?

Apply both suggestions immediately without review.

Investigate and fix the null pointer issue, then consider the rename if time permits.

Ignore both suggestions because the AI might be wrong.

Rename the variable first because it is a quick fix.

GitLabCertified Duo Agent Platform Associate

Domain 4Objective 2

Use AI-assisted Code Review CERTIFIED-GITLAB-DUO-AI-ASSOCIATE Practice Questions (Page 3)

Part of the AI-Assisted Code Workflows domain, which makes up ~29% of our current practice bank.

24questions here

5free pages

6concepts

Questions 11–15

11application · medium
A company is introducing AI-assisted code review to help new developers learn coding standards. They want to ensure that the AI feedback is educational and not just a list of corrections. What is the best way to use AI review for this purpose?
Select an answer first
12foundation · easy
Which of the following is an example of a minor improvement that an AI review might suggest?
Select an answer first
13foundation · easy
What is a best practice for using AI-assisted code review effectively?
Select an answer first
14application · medium
An AI review suggests using a more efficient data structure in a performance-critical section of code. The developer applies the suggestion, but the code now fails a unit test. What should the developer do?
Select an answer first
15application · medium
During an AI-assisted code review, the AI flags a potential null pointer dereference in a new function and also suggests renaming a local variable for clarity. The developer has limited time. What should the developer prioritize?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CERTIFIED-GITLAB-DUO-AI-ASSOCIATE

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by GitLab. “CERTIFIED-GITLAB-DUO-AI-ASSOCIATE” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.