Use AI-assisted Code Review CERTIFIED-GITLAB-DUO-AI-ASSOCIATE Practice Questions (Page 2)

Questions 6–10

1. 6application · medium

   An AI review generates several comments on a merge request. One comment says 'This function is too complex and should be refactored.' Another says 'Consider using a constant for this magic number.' The developer has limited time. What should they do?

   • ARefactor the function immediately because complexity is a critical issue.
   • BDismiss both comments because they are subjective.
   • CReplace the magic number with a constant, then refactor the function if time allows.
   • DEscalate both comments to the team lead for prioritization.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
2. 7expert · hard

   A team is using AI-assisted code review. They notice that the AI sometimes generates comments that are not actionable, such as 'Consider improving this code.' The team wants to reduce noise and keep the review process focused. What is the best approach?

   • AOnly use AI review on MRs that are larger than 500 lines.
   • BDisable AI review for MRs that are not related to critical features.
   • CTrain the team to dismiss or resolve non-actionable comments quickly.
   • DStop using AI review altogether because of the noise.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
4. 8application · medium

   After an AI review, a developer sees a comment about a potential security vulnerability in a dependency. The developer is not sure if the vulnerability is real. What is the appropriate way to manage this comment?

   • AResolve the comment after verifying the vulnerability with the dependency's documentation.
   • BDismiss the comment because AI is not reliable for security issues.
   • CEscalate the comment to the security team immediately.
   • DIgnore the comment and continue with the MR.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
5. 9application · easy

   A developer is working on a large merge request with many changes. They want to get AI feedback on the entire MR before starting to address comments. What is the recommended first step?

   • ASplit the MR into smaller MRs to make the AI review more accurate.
   • BUse the AI to review only the files that were changed most recently.
   • CTrigger the AI review from the merge request page.
   • DAsk a colleague to manually review the MR first.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
6. 10application · medium

   A team is adopting AI-assisted code review. They want to ensure it improves code quality without creating a bottleneck. Which practice aligns with best practices?

   • AOnly use AI review on MRs that are likely to have bugs.
   • BDisable AI review for senior developers because they don't need it.
   • CUse AI review as the sole gatekeeper for merging MRs.
   • DRun AI review on every MR and have human reviewers focus on areas the AI cannot assess.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first