Objective 2.08 Given a Scenario Configure a Deployment Using Auto-Discovery [behavior of Delete Versus No-Delete with Auto-Discovery, Compatibility with Translation, and Route Domains] 302 Practice Questions (Page 2)

Questions 6–10

1. 6foundation · easy

   What is the key difference between auto-discovery with delete enabled versus no-delete mode?

   • ADelete mode removes stale objects; no-delete mode retains them
   • BDelete mode requires manual confirmation; no-delete mode is automatic
   • CDelete mode is for virtual servers; no-delete mode is for pools
   • DDelete mode only adds new objects; no-delete mode updates existing ones
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
2. 7foundation · easy

   Which BIG-IP DNS objects are typically discovered by auto-discovery?

   • ADNS zones and resource records
   • BVirtual servers and pools
   • CSSL certificates and keys
   • DSNAT pools and NATs
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
4. 8expert · hard

   A service provider hosts multiple customers on a shared BIG-IP DNS infrastructure. Each customer has their own route domain and some customers use NAT for their servers. The provider wants to use auto-discovery to manage DNS records for all customers, but they need to ensure that records are correctly associated with the right route domain and that translation is applied only where needed. What is the best approach?

   • ACreate a separate auto-discovery configuration for each customer, specifying the correct route domain and translation settings.
   • BDisable auto-discovery and manually create records for each customer.
   • CUse a single auto-discovery configuration that covers all route domains and enables translation globally.
   • DUse route domain 0 for all customers and rely on the NAT to differentiate them.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
5. 9expert · hard

   A company has a BIG-IP DNS system with multiple route domains. They use auto-discovery to manage records for servers in route domain 3. The servers in this route domain are behind a NAT that translates their addresses to public addresses. The DNS administrator wants to ensure that the discovered records contain the public addresses and are associated with route domain 3. However, they also have a few servers in route domain 3 that should not be translated. What is the best way to handle this?

   • ACreate two auto-discovery configurations for route domain 3: one with translation enabled and one with translation disabled.
   • BDisable translation for the entire auto-discovery configuration and manually add records for the translated servers.
   • CUse a different route domain for the non-translated servers.
   • DEnable translation for the entire auto-discovery configuration and exclude the non-translated servers from the discovery scope.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
6. 10expert · hard

   An organization has a BIG-IP DNS system with multiple route domains. They use auto-discovery to manage records for servers in route domain 10. The servers in this route domain are behind a NAT that translates their addresses to public addresses. The DNS administrator wants to ensure that the discovered records contain the public addresses and are associated with route domain 10. However, they also have a few servers in route domain 10 that should not be translated. What is the best way to handle this?

   • ACreate two auto-discovery configurations for route domain 10: one with translation enabled and one with translation disabled.
   • BUse a different route domain for the non-translated servers.
   • CDisable translation for the entire auto-discovery configuration and manually add records for the translated servers.
   • DEnable translation for the entire auto-discovery configuration and exclude the non-translated servers from the discovery scope.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first