A blockchain project wants to ensure that all stakeholders, including developers, miners, and token holders, have a say in governance decisions. They also want to avoid the risk of a small group dominating the process. Which governance model would be most appropriate?

A pure token-weighted voting system

A multi-stakeholder council with representatives from each group and a voting mechanism

A developer-only governance model

A blockchain project wants to implement a governance system that is resistant to token-holder apathy and low voter turnout. Which governance model would best address this concern?

Direct on-chain voting where every token holder votes on every proposal

A system where miners decide all governance issues

Delegated proof-of-stake where token holders delegate their voting power to a smaller number of representatives

Off-chain governance where only developers vote

A blockchain network is considering a hard fork that will change the transaction format. The change is not backward-compatible. The team is concerned about replay attacks, where a transaction signed on one chain is replayed on the other. What is the most effective way to prevent replay attacks?

Rely on exchanges to filter transactions

Add a chain ID to the transaction signature so that transactions are only valid on one chain

Use a soft fork to avoid the replay issue

Ask users to manually send their transactions twice

During a network upgrade, a miner produces a block that is valid under the new consensus rules but invalid under the old rules. A node running the old software receives this block. What will the node do?

Reject the block and continue following the old chain

Request a new block from the miner

Accept the block and forward it to other old nodes

Accept the block and upgrade its software automatically

A blockchain startup wants to implement a governance model that allows token holders to vote directly on protocol parameter changes (e.g., block size, gas limits) without relying on a core developer team to implement and deploy the changes. The team also wants to minimize the risk of a contentious hard fork. Which governance approach best meets these requirements?

A foundation-controlled governance model with a technical committee

Off-chain governance with a core developer team and community discussions

A hybrid model where developers propose but miners decide via signaling

On-chain governance with a formal proposal and voting mechanism

EC-CouncilBlockchain Developer Certification

Domain 1Objective 6

Governance, Upgrades, and Forks BDC Practice Questions (Page 5)

Part of the Blockchain Fundamentals and Architecture domain, which makes up ~14% of our current practice bank.

50questions here

10free pages

7concepts

Questions 21–25

21application · medium
A blockchain project wants to ensure that all stakeholders, including developers, miners, and token holders, have a say in governance decisions. They also want to avoid the risk of a small group dominating the process. Which governance model would be most appropriate?
Select an answer first
22application · medium
A blockchain project wants to implement a governance system that is resistant to token-holder apathy and low voter turnout. Which governance model would best address this concern?
Select an answer first
23expert · hard
A blockchain network is considering a hard fork that will change the transaction format. The change is not backward-compatible. The team is concerned about replay attacks, where a transaction signed on one chain is replayed on the other. What is the most effective way to prevent replay attacks?
Select an answer first
24application · medium
During a network upgrade, a miner produces a block that is valid under the new consensus rules but invalid under the old rules. A node running the old software receives this block. What will the node do?
Select an answer first
25application · medium
A blockchain startup wants to implement a governance model that allows token holders to vote directly on protocol parameter changes (e.g., block size, gas limits) without relying on a core developer team to implement and deploy the changes. The team also wants to minimize the risk of a contentious hard fork. Which governance approach best meets these requirements?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to BDC

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by EC-Council. “BDC” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.