A service provider must automate BGP configuration across Junos and third-party routers. They value consistent behavior and reduced per-vendor code, but they also need to use some vendor-specific BGP features not covered by OpenConfig. What is the most effective strategy?

Use OpenConfig for common BGP settings and vendor-native models only for the specific features

Use only vendor-native models to get full feature coverage

Use only OpenConfig models and abandon the vendor-specific features

Use OpenConfig for all BGP configuration and rely on deviations to cover vendor-specific features

A network engineering team manages a fleet of routers from multiple vendors. They want to automate interface configuration using a single set of YANG models to reduce per-vendor scripting. Which approach best meets this requirement?

Use SNMP MIBs for configuration instead of YANG

Use OpenConfig YANG models for interface configuration across all devices

Use vendor-native YANG models for each device and write a translation layer

Use CLI scripting with vendor-specific commands

Juniper NetworksCertified Specialist, Automation and DevOps (JNCIS-DevOps)

Domain 5Objective 2

OpenConfig JN0-423 Practice Questions (Page 4)

Part of the YANG domain, which makes up ~15% of our current practice bank. Juniper Networks does not publish an official question count, but from its 90-minute exam (~35–60 total, ~5–9 in this domain), expect 2–3 from this objective — we provide 23 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

23questions here

5free pages

6concepts

Questions 16–20

16application · medium
A network team wants to stream telemetry data for interface counters to a collector. They need to use a protocol that supports both configuration and telemetry. Which protocol should they choose?
Select an answer first
17expert · hard
A service provider must automate BGP configuration across Junos and third-party routers. They value consistent behavior and reduced per-vendor code, but they also need to use some vendor-specific BGP features not covered by OpenConfig. What is the most effective strategy?
Select an answer first
18foundation · easy
Which protocol is commonly used to retrieve or edit data modeled by OpenConfig?
Select an answer first
19application · medium
A network architect is evaluating YANG models for a new multi-vendor network. They want to ensure that the same configuration can be applied to all devices regardless of vendor. Which model set should they choose?
Select an answer first
20application · medium
A network engineering team manages a fleet of routers from multiple vendors. They want to automate interface configuration using a single set of YANG models to reduce per-vendor scripting. Which approach best meets this requirement?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to JN0-423

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by Juniper Networks. “JN0-423” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.

OpenConfig JN0-423 Practice Questions (Page 4)

Questions 16–20

A network team wants to stream telemetry data for interface counters to a collector. They need to use a protocol that supports both configuration and telemetry. Which protocol should they choose?

A service provider must automate BGP configuration across Junos and third-party routers. They value consistent behavior and reduced per-vendor code, but they also need to use some vendor-specific BGP features not covered by OpenConfig. What is the most effective strategy?

Which protocol is commonly used to retrieve or edit data modeled by OpenConfig?

A network architect is evaluating YANG models for a new multi-vendor network. They want to ensure that the same configuration can be applied to all devices regardless of vendor. Which model set should they choose?

A network engineering team manages a fleet of routers from multiple vendors. They want to automate interface configuration using a single set of YANG models to reduce per-vendor scripting. Which approach best meets this requirement?

Keep studying — YANG