A team is organizing a quality hunting event for a complex application. They have limited time and a small group of participants. They want to maximize the number of defects found. Which approach is most effective?

Focus only on the most complex parts of the application.

Provide a detailed script for each participant to follow.

Have all participants explore the entire application together.

Divide the application into areas and assign each participant a specific area to explore.

A team wants to run a quality hunting event to find defects that automated tests miss. They have a small group of experienced testers. What is a key difference between this event and regular testing that they should leverage?

The event is exploratory and collaborative, encouraging testers to follow their intuition.

The event is focused on verifying requirements, not finding defects.

The event is automated to save time.

The event follows a strict test script to ensure repeatability.

A company is considering using crowd testing for the first time. They are concerned about the quality of the testers. What is a key factor in ensuring the quality of a crowd testing campaign?

Using as many testers as possible to increase coverage.

Selecting testers based on their profiles and experience relevant to the product.

Choosing the cheapest crowd testing provider available.

Providing minimal instructions to allow testers to explore freely.

How do quality hunting events differ from regular testing activities?

They are only performed by the quality assurance team

They are focused, time-boxed sessions that encourage creative exploration beyond predefined test cases

They are always automated and run without human intervention

They are conducted after every production release to verify stability

Certified Tester Quality in DevOps

Domain 3Objective 5

Crowd Testing and Quality Hunting CT-QDO Practice Questions (Page 5)

Part of the Domain 3: Automated and Manual Tasks in DevOps domain, which makes up ~21% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 60-minute exam (~25–40 total, ~5–8 in this domain), expect 1–2 from this objective — we provide 24 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

24questions here

5free pages

5concepts

Questions 21–24

21expert · hard
A team is organizing a quality hunting event for a complex application. They have limited time and a small group of participants. They want to maximize the number of defects found. Which approach is most effective?
Select an answer first
22application · medium
A team wants to run a quality hunting event to find defects that automated tests miss. They have a small group of experienced testers. What is a key difference between this event and regular testing that they should leverage?
Select an answer first
23application · medium
A company is considering using crowd testing for the first time. They are concerned about the quality of the testers. What is a key factor in ensuring the quality of a crowd testing campaign?
Select an answer first
24foundation · easy
How do quality hunting events differ from regular testing activities?
Select an answer first

Finished these 4 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

No more pagesBack to CT-QDO

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-QDO” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.