A cross-functional agile team is about to test a new feature that integrates with several external systems. The feature is complex and the team has diverse expertise. They want to maximize defect detection in a short time. Which collaborative testing approach is most effective?

Ask the product owner to test the feature, since they know the requirements best.

Assign each team member a different part of the feature to test independently, then combine the findings at the end.

Have the most experienced tester test the feature alone, since they have the most knowledge about the system.

Conduct a mob testing session where the whole team explores the feature together, with one person driving and others contributing ideas.

What should be communicated to stakeholders after an exploratory testing session?

A guarantee that the software is ready for release.

The detailed steps of every test performed.

A summary of findings, coverage, and risks discovered during the session.

Only the number of test cases executed.

How can experience-based testing be aligned with user stories in agile?

By executing all exploratory tests before the user story is developed.

By ensuring that every exploratory test is automated and added to the regression suite.

By using the user story's acceptance criteria as a starting point for exploratory testing.

By replacing user stories with test charters to avoid duplication.

A team is conducting a mob testing session for a critical feature. The session is time-boxed to 90 minutes. Halfway through, the team has found several defects but has not yet explored a key integration point. The team is divided on whether to continue exploring the integration point or to document and discuss the defects found so far. What should the team do?

Continue exploring the integration point for the remaining time, and document all findings at the end of the session.

Extend the session by another 30 minutes to ensure the integration point is fully explored.

Split the team: some continue exploring the integration point while others document the defects.

Stop the session immediately to document and discuss the defects found so far, even though the time-box is not over.

Why is time-boxing important in exploratory testing sessions?

It guarantees that all defects are found within the session.

It allows testers to automate the session without manual intervention.

It prevents testers from spending too much time on one area and encourages focused exploration.

It ensures that all test cases are executed exactly as written.

Certified Tester Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester

Domain 2Objective 2

Experience-Based Testing in Agile CT-ATT Practice Questions (Page 3)

Part of the Testing in Agile domain, which makes up ~42% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 90-minute exam (~35–60 total, ~15–25 in this domain), expect 5–8 from this objective — we provide 30 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

30questions here

6free pages

7concepts

Questions 11–15

11application · medium
A cross-functional agile team is about to test a new feature that integrates with several external systems. The feature is complex and the team has diverse expertise. They want to maximize defect detection in a short time. Which collaborative testing approach is most effective?
Select an answer first
12foundation · easy
What should be communicated to stakeholders after an exploratory testing session?
Select an answer first
13foundation · easy
How can experience-based testing be aligned with user stories in agile?
Select an answer first
14expert · hard
A team is conducting a mob testing session for a critical feature. The session is time-boxed to 90 minutes. Halfway through, the team has found several defects but has not yet explored a key integration point. The team is divided on whether to continue exploring the integration point or to document and discuss the defects found so far. What should the team do?
Select an answer first
15foundation · easy
Why is time-boxing important in exploratory testing sessions?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CT-ATT

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-ATT” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.