A team evaluated a model and needs to document the findings for a technical audience. Which format is most appropriate?

A verbal summary without any written documentation.

A detailed report including the confusion matrix, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC.

A presentation with only visual charts and no numerical metrics.

A one-page summary with only the overall accuracy.

Certified Tester AI Testing

Domain 5Objective 3

Hands-On Exercise: Evaluate the Created ML Model CT-AI Practice Questions (Page 5)

Part of the Domain 5: ML Functional Performance Metrics domain, which makes up ~5% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 60-minute exam (~25–40 total, ~1–2 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 21 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

21questions here

5free pages

4concepts

Questions 21–21

21application · medium
A team evaluated a model and needs to document the findings for a technical audience. Which format is most appropriate?
Select an answer first

Finished these 1 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

No more pagesBack to CT-AI

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-AI” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.

Hands-On Exercise: Evaluate the Created ML Model CT-AI Practice Questions (Page 5)

Questions 21–21

A team evaluated a model and needs to document the findings for a technical audience. Which format is most appropriate?

Keep studying — Domain 5: ML Functional Performance Metrics