A product owner has defined acceptance criteria for a new reporting feature, but the test team is unsure about the exact format of the exported report. The team wants to ensure the acceptance tests reflect the business needs accurately. What is the best way to resolve this uncertainty?

Proceed with the tests based on the team's best guess and document the assumption.

Use exploratory testing to discover the format and then write the tests.

Ask the developer to decide the report format and write tests accordingly.

Invite the product owner to a collaborative test design session to review the criteria and clarify the expected report format.

Which factor is commonly used to prioritize acceptance tests?

The number of testers available

The risk associated with the functionality being tested

What is the primary focus of use case testing in acceptance testing?

Validating end-to-end user interactions with the system

Testing the system's performance under load

Testing the system's internal data structures

Testing individual functions in isolation

What is the primary benefit of using a systematic technique to design acceptance tests from acceptance criteria?

It eliminates the need for test documentation

It ensures that tests are created in a structured way, improving coverage and maintainability

It reduces the total number of test cases to exactly one per criterion

It guarantees that all acceptance tests will pass on the first execution

A team is testing a new search feature. The acceptance criteria cover standard search queries, but the team is worried about edge cases that might not be covered. They decide to use exploratory testing to complement the scripted tests. Which exploratory testing session is most likely to uncover defects?

A session that repeats the same search query multiple times to check consistency.

A session that tests only the most common search queries used by customers.

A session focused on searching with special characters, empty strings, and extremely long queries.

A session that verifies the search results are sorted correctly.

Certified Tester Acceptance Testing

Domain 2Objective 2

Objective: Designing Acceptance Tests CT-ACT Practice Questions (Page 4)

Part of the Domain 2: Acceptance Criteria, Acceptance Tests and Experience-Based Practices domain, which makes up ~23% of our current practice bank. ISTQB does not publish an official question count, but from its 60-minute exam (~25–40 total, ~6–9 in this domain), expect 2–3 from this objective — we provide 25 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

25questions here

5free pages

8concepts

Questions 16–20

16application · medium
A product owner has defined acceptance criteria for a new reporting feature, but the test team is unsure about the exact format of the exported report. The team wants to ensure the acceptance tests reflect the business needs accurately. What is the best way to resolve this uncertainty?
Select an answer first
17foundation · easy
Which factor is commonly used to prioritize acceptance tests?
Select an answer first
18foundation · easy
What is the primary focus of use case testing in acceptance testing?
Select an answer first
19foundation · easy
What is the primary benefit of using a systematic technique to design acceptance tests from acceptance criteria?
Select an answer first
20application · medium
A team is testing a new search feature. The acceptance criteria cover standard search queries, but the team is worried about edge cases that might not be covered. They decide to use exploratory testing to complement the scripted tests. Which exploratory testing session is most likely to uncover defects?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CT-ACT

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by ISTQB. “CT-ACT” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.