An organization is concerned about an agentic AI feature that can autonomously close issues and merge requests. What is the most effective way to maintain human control?

Rely on the AI's built-in ethical guidelines to prevent mistakes

Allow the AI to act freely but review its actions at the end of the sprint

Configure the feature to require approval for sensitive actions like closing or merging

Disable the agentic feature entirely

Why is human oversight important when using agentic AI in GitLab?

To review and approve actions that have significant impact.

To provide the AI with more training data.

To replace the need for automated testing.

To ensure the AI does not make any mistakes.

A team wants GitLab Duo to automatically fix failing tests, run the pipeline, and update the merge request with results. They want to review the changes before merging. What is the best way to set this up?

Enable agentic features to run the entire workflow without any checkpoints

Use Duo Chat to manually fix the tests and run the pipeline

Use agentic features to create a merge request with the fix, then have a human review and approve it

Create a CI/CD job that automatically merges the fix without review

A development team uses GitLab Duo Chat to ask questions about their codebase. They want to move beyond Q&A and have the AI automatically create a merge request that fixes a failing test. Which GitLab Duo capability should they use?

GitLab Duo Chat with a prompt that asks for a code fix

GitLab Duo Code Review that automatically reviews and merges the fix

GitLab Duo Agentic features that can execute multi-step tasks and create a merge request

GitLab Duo Root Cause Analysis that directly patches the test failure

GitLabCertified Duo Agent Platform Associate

Domain 5Objective 1

Understand Agentic AI Concepts in GitLab CERTIFIED-GITLAB-DUO-AI-ASSOCIATE Practice Questions (Page 3)

Part of the Agentic AI Fundamentals domain, which makes up ~21% of our current practice bank.

26questions here

6free pages

6concepts

Questions 11–15

11application · medium
An organization is concerned about an agentic AI feature that can autonomously close issues and merge requests. What is the most effective way to maintain human control?
Select an answer first
12foundation · easy
Why is human oversight important when using agentic AI in GitLab?
Select an answer first
13application · medium
A team wants GitLab Duo to automatically fix failing tests, run the pipeline, and update the merge request with results. They want to review the changes before merging. What is the best way to set this up?
Select an answer first
14application · medium
A team wants to use GitLab Duo to automatically identify duplicate issues and suggest closing them. Which use case does this align with?
Select an answer first
15application · medium
A development team uses GitLab Duo Chat to ask questions about their codebase. They want to move beyond Q&A and have the AI automatically create a merge request that fixes a failing test. Which GitLab Duo capability should they use?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to CERTIFIED-GITLAB-DUO-AI-ASSOCIATE

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by GitLab. “CERTIFIED-GITLAB-DUO-AI-ASSOCIATE” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.