What is the purpose of an autofix suggestion in code scanning?

To change the severity of the alert

To automatically fix the vulnerability without any developer action

To provide a recommended code change that the developer can apply

To dismiss the alert as a false positive

What is the first step in a structured remediation workflow for a code scanning alert?

Close the alert without any action

Create a GitHub issue to track the fix

Apply an autofix suggestion without review

A developer is looking at a code scanning alert for a path traversal vulnerability. The alert details show the affected code and a 'Paths' tab. The developer wants to know if the vulnerability is reachable from user input. What should the developer do?

Click on the 'Paths' tab to see the dataflow from user input to the file operation.

Check the 'Tags' section for metadata.

Dismiss the alert because the code is not reachable.

Look at the 'Rule' description to understand the vulnerability.

Why is it important to assign an owner to a code scanning alert during remediation?

To ensure someone is responsible for fixing the vulnerability

To change the severity of the alert

To prevent other developers from seeing the alert

To automatically close the alert

A security engineer is investigating a code scanning alert that has been open for several weeks. The alert is for a potential denial-of-service vulnerability. The engineer wants to understand why the alert has not been fixed and whether it is still relevant. What is the best way to get this information?

Re-run the code scanning analysis to see if the alert is still present.

Adjust the severity of the alert to 'low' to reduce its priority.

Review the alert's timeline and comments to see the history and any discussions.

Dismiss the alert because it has been open for too long.

GitHubAdvanced Security (GH-500)

Domain 4Objective 3

Analyze, Triage, and Remediate Code Scanning Results GH-500 Practice Questions (Page 4)

Part of the Configure and use Code Security (formerly Code Scanning with CodeQL) domain, which accounts for 10-15% of the GH-500 exam.

22questions here

5free pages

7concepts

10-15%of the exam

Questions 16–20

16foundation · easy
What is the purpose of an autofix suggestion in code scanning?
Select an answer first
17foundation · easy
What is the first step in a structured remediation workflow for a code scanning alert?
Select an answer first
18application · medium
A developer is looking at a code scanning alert for a path traversal vulnerability. The alert details show the affected code and a 'Paths' tab. The developer wants to know if the vulnerability is reachable from user input. What should the developer do?
Select an answer first
19foundation · easy
Why is it important to assign an owner to a code scanning alert during remediation?
Select an answer first
20expert · hard
A security engineer is investigating a code scanning alert that has been open for several weeks. The alert is for a potential denial-of-service vulnerability. The engineer wants to understand why the alert has not been fixed and whether it is still relevant. What is the best way to get this information?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to GH-500

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by GitHub. “GH-500” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.