A startup uses GitHub Copilot for all developers. A developer asks: 'If I accept a suggestion from Copilot, who owns the code that gets committed to our repository?' The startup has a standard enterprise agreement with GitHub. What is the correct answer?

GitHub owns the code because it was generated by their AI model

The organization owns the code, as it is created within the scope of employment and subject to the enterprise agreement

The code is in the public domain because it was generated by an AI

The developer who accepted the suggestion owns the code as the author

A developer uses Copilot to generate a complex sorting algorithm. The code passes unit tests but the developer notices it performs poorly on large datasets. What should the developer do?

Use Copilot to generate a more efficient algorithm and assume it is better

Accept the code because it passes tests and is likely correct

Optimize the code manually or use a different approach, as Copilot's output may not be optimal

Report the issue to GitHub as a bug in Copilot

Why is it important for developers to review code suggested by GitHub Copilot?

Because suggestions may not be accurate or may introduce licensing issues

Because Copilot requires manual approval before suggestions are inserted

Because Copilot's suggestions are always incomplete and need finishing

Because Copilot cannot suggest code for certain programming languages

A developer uses Copilot to generate a code snippet that includes a function from an open-source library. The developer is unsure if the snippet is copied verbatim from the library. What should the developer do?

Avoid using Copilot for any code that might be similar to open-source code

Use the code as-is because Copilot generates original code

Ask GitHub to provide a license for the generated code

Search for the code online to check for similarities and review the license

In GitHub Copilot, what is the primary purpose of configuring content exclusions?

To disable Copilot entirely for a repository

To prevent specific files or code from being used to generate suggestions

To block Copilot from suggesting code that matches open-source licenses

To encrypt code before it is sent to GitHub servers

GitHubCopilot Certification

Domain 6Objective 1

Manage Privacy Settings and Exclusions GH-300 Practice Questions (Page 2)

Part of the Configure privacy, content exclusions, and safeguards domain, which accounts for 10-15% of the GH-300 exam.

13questions here

3free pages

4concepts

10-15%of the exam

Questions 6–10

6application · medium
A startup uses GitHub Copilot for all developers. A developer asks: 'If I accept a suggestion from Copilot, who owns the code that gets committed to our repository?' The startup has a standard enterprise agreement with GitHub. What is the correct answer?
Select an answer first
7application · medium
A developer uses Copilot to generate a complex sorting algorithm. The code passes unit tests but the developer notices it performs poorly on large datasets. What should the developer do?
Select an answer first
8foundation · easy
Why is it important for developers to review code suggested by GitHub Copilot?
Select an answer first
9application · medium
A developer uses Copilot to generate a code snippet that includes a function from an open-source library. The developer is unsure if the snippet is copied verbatim from the library. What should the developer do?
Select an answer first
10foundation · easy
In GitHub Copilot, what is the primary purpose of configuring content exclusions?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

Next 5 questions →Back to GH-300

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by GitHub. “GH-300” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.