An organization owner wants to enforce a consistent Copilot experience across all repositories and members. Which setting should they configure at the organization level?

Create a custom GitHub App to manage Copilot

Enable Copilot for all members by default

Set a repository-level .github/copilot.yml file

Assign Copilot seats individually via the Members tab

What is the primary purpose of enabling Copilot Code Review at the organization level?

Generate commit messages for merged pull requests

Block pull requests that contain syntax errors

Replace human code reviews entirely

Automatically review pull requests for suggested changes

A company wants to ensure that only users in the 'engineering' team are assigned Copilot seats. The administrator wants to automate this so that when a new engineer joins, they are automatically assigned a seat. What is the best way to achieve this?

Use the audit log to identify new members and then assign them seats.

Use the Copilot settings page to manually add each new engineer.

Create a GitHub Action that assigns Copilot seats to all organization members.

Use the REST API to assign Copilot seats to users in the 'engineering' team, and run this script on a schedule.

An organization wants to allow Copilot for all members, but the legal team requires that code suggestions matching public code be blocked. The administrator also needs to ensure that this policy is applied consistently across all IDEs. What is the best approach?

Use the REST API to set the suggestion matching policy for each user individually.

Configure the suggestion matching policy in each IDE's settings.

Configure the organization-wide Copilot policy to block suggestion matching, which applies to all IDEs.

Disable Copilot for all members and re-enable it only for those who agree to the legal terms.

GitHubCopilot Certification

Domain 2Objective 4

Manage Organization-Wide Settings and Policies GH-300 Practice Questions (Page 3)

Part of the Use GitHub Copilot features domain, which accounts for 25-30% of the GH-300 exam.

15questions here

3free pages

5concepts

25-30%of the exam

Questions 11–15

11foundation · easy
An organization owner wants to enforce a consistent Copilot experience across all repositories and members. Which setting should they configure at the organization level?
Select an answer first
12foundation · easy
What is the primary purpose of enabling Copilot Code Review at the organization level?
Select an answer first
13application · medium
A company wants to ensure that only users in the 'engineering' team are assigned Copilot seats. The administrator wants to automate this so that when a new engineer joins, they are automatically assigned a seat. What is the best way to achieve this?
Select an answer first
14foundation · easy
Where would an organization admin find a record of a Copilot policy change?
Select an answer first
15expert · hard
An organization wants to allow Copilot for all members, but the legal team requires that code suggestions matching public code be blocked. The administrator also needs to ensure that this policy is applied consistently across all IDEs. What is the best approach?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

No more pagesBack to GH-300

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by GitHub. “GH-300” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.