Analysis of Competing Hypotheses TIE Practice Questions (Page 8)

Questions 36–40

1. 36application · medium

   An analyst is following the ACH process to analyze a series of account takeovers. The analyst has identified three hypotheses, collected evidence, and built the matrix. After evaluating the evidence, one hypothesis is inconsistent with several pieces of evidence. What is the next step in the ACH process?

   • AAdd more evidence to the matrix to see if the hypothesis becomes consistent.
   • BRefute the hypothesis and remove it from the matrix.
   • CRe-evaluate the evidence to find a way to make the hypothesis consistent.
   • DPresent the hypothesis as still viable because it might be correct.
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
2. 37foundation · easy

   When presenting the results of an ACH analysis, what should be included to help the audience understand the reasoning?

   • AOnly the final conclusion and the recommended action
   • BThe personal opinion of the lead analyst
   • CA detailed explanation of the evidence and how it supports or refutes each hypothesis
   • DA list of all possible hypotheses without any evaluation
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
4. 38foundation · easy

   If a sensitivity analysis reveals that changing the interpretation of a single piece of evidence reverses the ranking of the top two hypotheses, what should the analyst conclude?

   • AThe evidence is irrelevant and should be discarded
   • BThe analyst should select the hypothesis that was ranked second
   • CThe conclusion is highly sensitive to that evidence and should be reported with caution
   • DThe conclusion is robust and can be reported with high confidence
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
5. 39application · medium

   Your threat intelligence team is debating whether to adopt ACH for a high-stakes attribution case. A senior analyst argues that ACH is too time-consuming and that the team's experience is sufficient. Which benefit of ACH most directly addresses this concern?

   • AACH guarantees the correct attribution in every case
   • BACH forces explicit consideration of alternative explanations, reducing the risk of cognitive bias
   • CACH eliminates the need for further intelligence collection
   • DACH is faster than intuitive analysis
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first
6. 40foundation · easy

   When evaluating evidence in ACH, what is the primary question an analyst should ask about each piece of evidence?

   • AIs this evidence consistent or inconsistent with each hypothesis?
   • BIs this evidence from a reliable and credible source?
   • CDoes this evidence support the most likely hypothesis?
   • DIs this evidence quantitative or qualitative?
   Reveal Solution Discussion Select an answer first