
EC-CouncilCertified Encryption Specialist
Domain 3Objective 3
Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange and Random Number Generators ECES Practice Questions (Page 8)
Part of the Asymmetric Cryptography and Number Theory domain, which makes up ~17% of our current practice bank. EC-Council does not publish an official question count, but from its 120-minute exam (~50–80 total, ~9–14 in this domain), expect 3–5 from this objective — we provide 40 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)
40questions here
8free pages
7concepts
Questions 36–40
- 36
A company is implementing a secure messaging system. They want to use Diffie-Hellman to establish a shared secret, but they are concerned about man-in-the-middle attacks. Which additional mechanism should they implement to mitigate this risk?
Select an answer first - 37
A security auditor is evaluating a system that generates Diffie-Hellman keys. The system uses a PRNG seeded with a 32-bit value derived from the system clock. Which vulnerability does this introduce?
Select an answer first - 38
A developer is implementing a PRNG for a non-cryptographic simulation and a separate CSPRNG for key generation. Which comparison is accurate?
Select an answer first - 39
An organization is setting up a new server that will generate Diffie-Hellman key pairs for TLS connections. The server has a CPU that provides the RDRAND instruction, which uses an on-die hardware entropy source. The system administrator wants to ensure that the random numbers used for key generation are cryptographically secure. Which approach best utilizes the available hardware entropy while maintaining security?
Select an answer first - 40
In Diffie-Hellman, if p = 23 and g = 5 (a primitive root modulo 23), and Alice's private key is a = 6, what is Alice's public value A?
Select an answer first
Finished these 5 questions?
Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.
No more pagesBack to ECES
Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by EC-Council. “ECES” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.