
EC-CouncilCertified Application Security Engineer (.NET)
Domain 5Objective 2
Asymmetric Encryption and Defensive Coding CASENET Practice Questions (Page 1)
Part of the Secure Coding: Cryptography domain, which makes up ~12% of our current practice bank. EC-Council does not publish an official question count, but from its 120-minute exam (~50–80 total, ~6–10 in this domain), expect 1–2 from this objective — we provide 28 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)
28questions here
6free pages
7concepts
Questions 1–5
- 1
A company is migrating its .NET application to Azure and needs to manage RSA private keys for signing. The compliance team requires that keys be stored in a FIPS 140-2 Level 3 validated hardware security module (HSM) and that keys never leave the HSM. Which Azure service should the developer use?
Select an answer first - 2
A .NET developer is choosing between RSA and ECC for a new system that requires both encryption and digital signatures. The system must minimize bandwidth usage and computational overhead. Which algorithm is the better choice?
Select an answer first - 3
What is a common pitfall to avoid when implementing asymmetric encryption in code?
Select an answer first - 4
A .NET developer is building a secure messaging feature that must encrypt large attachments (up to 100 MB) while ensuring that only the intended recipient can decrypt them. The developer plans to use RSA for the encryption. What should the developer do to achieve both security and performance?
Select an answer first - 5
A .NET developer is implementing a certificate-based authentication system. The application needs to validate that a client's certificate is still trusted. Which practice should be implemented to ensure that a compromised or expired client certificate is no longer accepted?
Select an answer first
Finished these 5 questions?
Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.
Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by EC-Council. “CASENET” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.