A team uses a shared main branch and a long-lived feature branch. The feature branch has been merged into main once, but a bug was found and reverted on main. The developer now wants to continue working on the feature branch and eventually merge it again. They have made new commits on the feature branch. What is the best approach to avoid reintroducing the reverted bug when merging again?

Cherry-pick the new feature commits onto main

Reset the feature branch to the revert commit and reapply the new commits

Rebase the feature branch onto main and then merge it

Merge main into the feature branch, resolve any conflicts, and then merge the feature branch back into main

A developer runs `git checkout feature-2` while on the main branch. What is the primary effect of this command?

It switches the current branch to feature-2 and updates the working directory to match

It creates a new branch named feature-2

It restores the file named feature-2 from the current commit

It detaches HEAD and points it directly to the commit of feature-2

A developer is resolving a merge conflict in a file. They want to keep both the changes from the current branch and the changes from the branch being merged, combining them in the final file. After editing the file to include both sets of changes, what must they do to complete the merge?

git checkout --theirs and then git commit

git checkout --ours and then git commit

CiscoCertified DevNet Professional

Domain 1Objective 10

Utilize Advanced Version Control Operations with Git 350-901 Practice Questions (Page 5)

Part of the 1.0 Software Development and Design domain, which accounts for 20% of the 350-901 exam. Cisco does not publish an official question count, but from its 120-minute exam (~50–80 total, ~10–16 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 25 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)

25questions here

5free pages

5concepts

20%of the exam

Questions 21–25

21expert · hard
A team uses a shared main branch and a long-lived feature branch. The feature branch has been merged into main once, but a bug was found and reverted on main. The developer now wants to continue working on the feature branch and eventually merge it again. They have made new commits on the feature branch. What is the best approach to avoid reintroducing the reverted bug when merging again?
Select an answer first
22foundation · easy
Which `git reset` mode moves HEAD to a previous commit and also discards all changes in both the staging area and the working directory?
Select an answer first
23application · medium
A developer has made several commits on a local branch and wants to discard the last two commits entirely, removing them from the branch history. They do not care about the changes in those commits. Which command should they run?
Select an answer first
24foundation · easy
A developer runs `git checkout feature-2` while on the main branch. What is the primary effect of this command?
Select an answer first
25expert · medium
A developer is resolving a merge conflict in a file. They want to keep both the changes from the current branch and the changes from the branch being merged, combining them in the final file. After editing the file to include both sets of changes, what must they do to complete the merge?
Select an answer first

Finished these 5 questions?

Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.

No more pagesBack to 350-901

Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by Cisco. “350-901” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.

Utilize Advanced Version Control Operations with Git 350-901 Practice Questions (Page 5)

Questions 21–25

Which `git reset` mode moves HEAD to a previous commit and also discards all changes in both the staging area and the working directory?

A developer has made several commits on a local branch and wants to discard the last two commits entirely, removing them from the branch history. They do not care about the changes in those commits. Which command should they run?

A developer runs `git checkout feature-2` while on the main branch. What is the primary effect of this command?

A developer is resolving a merge conflict in a file. They want to keep both the changes from the current branch and the changes from the branch being merged, combining them in the final file. After editing the file to include both sets of changes, what must they do to complete the merge?

Keep studying — 1.0 Software Development and Design