
CiscoCertified DevNet Professional
Domain 1Objective 4
Evaluate an Application Design Considering Latency and Rate Limiting 350-901 Practice Questions (Page 2)
Part of the 1.0 Software Development and Design domain, which accounts for 20% of the 350-901 exam. Cisco does not publish an official question count, but from its 120-minute exam (~50–80 total, ~10–16 in this domain), expect 1–1 from this objective — we provide 28 practice questions to prepare you well beyond it. (estimate)
28questions here
6free pages
5concepts
20%of the exam
Questions 6–10
- 6
Which of the following is an example of an I/O delay that can affect application latency?
Select an answer first - 7
When evaluating the impact of latency on application design, which of the following is a common source of processing delay?
Select an answer first - 8
A company exposes a public API that is consumed by multiple third-party partners. To ensure fair usage, the API must limit each partner to 100 requests per minute. A partner is exceeding this limit and causing degraded performance for other partners. Which server-side rate limiting strategy should be implemented to enforce this limit per partner?
Select an answer first - 9
A team is designing a service that aggregates data from multiple upstream APIs. One upstream API is slow (500 ms) but has a high rate limit, while another is fast (50 ms) but has a strict rate limit. The service must minimize the overall response time for a user request that needs data from both APIs. Which approach best balances latency and rate limiting?
Select an answer first - 10
A company's API is experiencing high latency during peak hours because a single client is sending a large number of requests. The API is deployed on a single server. Which change would most directly address the latency caused by this client's behavior?
Select an answer first
Finished these 5 questions?
Review the revealed explanations, or continue through the curriculum.
Free Basic Practice is a study aid with revealable answers — not a scored exam. Examers.io is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by Cisco. “350-901” is a trademark of its owner, used for identification only.